THE QUR'AN AND MODERN SCIENCE
Extracted from the Book
 The Bible, The Qur'an and Science

Maurice Bucaille

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

THE CREATION OF THE HEAVENS

AND THE EARTH

 

 

Differences from and Resemblance to the Biblical Description

 

In contrast to the Old Testament, the Qur'an does not provide a unified description of the Creation. Instead of a continuous narration, there are passages scattered all over the Book which deal with certain aspects of the Creation and provide information on the successive events marking its development with varying degrees of detail. To gain a clear idea of how these events are presented, the fragments scattered throughout a large number of Suras have all to be brought together.

 

This dispersal throughout the Book of references to the same subject is not unique to the theme of the Creation. Many important subjects are treated in the same manner in the Qur'an: earthly or celestial phenomena, or problems concerning man that are of interest to Scientists. For each of these themes, the same effort has been made here to bring all the verses together.

 

For many European commentators, the description of the Creation in the Qur'an is very similar to the one in the Bible and they are quite content to present the two descriptions side by side. I believe this concept is mistaken because there are very obvious differences. On subjects that are by no means unimportant from a scientific point of view, we find in the Qur'an statements whose equivalents we search for in vain in the Bible. The latter contains descriptions that have no equivalent in the Qur'an.

 

The obvious resemblances between the two texts are well known; among them is the fact that, at first glance, the number given to the successive stages of the Creation is identical: the six days in the Bible correspond to the six days in the Qur'an. In fact however, the problem is more complex than this and it is worth pausing to examine it.

 

The Six Periods of The Creation

There is absolutely no ambiguity whatsoever in the Biblical description of the Creation in six days followed by a day of rest, the Sabbath, analogous with the days of the week. It has been shown how this mode of narration practiced by the priests of the Sixth century BC served the purpose of encouraging the people to observe the Sabbath. All Jews were expected to rest on the Sabbath as the Lord had done after he had labored during the six days of the week.

 

The way the Bible interprets it, the word 'day' means the interval of time between two successive sunrises or sunsets for an inhabitant of the earth. When defined in this way, the day is conditioned by the rotation of the Earth on its own axis. It is obvious that logically speaking there can be no question of 'days' as defined just now, if the mechanism that causes them to appear - i.e. the existence of the Earth and its rotation around the Sun - has not already been fixed in the early stages of the Creation according to the Biblical description. This impossibility has already been emphasized in the first part of the present book.

 

When we refer to the majority of translations of the Qur'an, we read that - analogous with the Biblical description - the process of the Creation for the Islamic Revelation also took place over a period of six days. It is difficult to hold against the translators the fact that they have translated the Arabic word by its most common meaning. This is how it is usually expressed in translations so that in the Qur'an, verse 54, Surah 7 reads as follows:

 

Your Lord is God Who created the heavens and the earth in six days.

 

There are very few translations and commentaries of the Qur'an that note how the word 'days' should really be taken to mean 'periods'. It has moreover been maintained that if the Qur'anic texts on the Creation divided its stages into 'days', it was with the deliberate intention of resuming beliefs held by all the Jews and Christians at the dawn of Islam and of avoiding a head-on confrontation with such a widely-held belief.

Without in any way wishing to reject this way of seeing it, one could perhaps examine the problem a little more closely and scrutinize in the Qur'an itself, and more generally in the language of the time, the possible meaning of the word that many translators themselves still continue to translate by the word 'day': yaum, plural ayyam in Arabic.

 

Its most common meaning is 'day' but it must be stressed that it tends more to mean the diurnal light than the length of time that lapses between one day's sunset and the next. The plural ayyam can mean, not just 'days', but also 'long lengths of time', an indefinite period of time (but always long). The meaning 'period of time' that the word contains is to be found elsewhere in the Qur'an. Hence the following:

- Surah 32, verse 5:

..in a period of time (yaum) whereof the measure is a thousand years of your reckoning.

(It is to be noted that the Creation in six periods is precisely what the verse preceding verse 5 refers to).

- Surah 70, verse 4:

 ..in a period of time (yaum) whereof the measure is 50,000 years

 

The fact that the word 'yaum' could mean a period of time that was quite different from the period that we mean by the word 'day' struck very early commentators who, of course, did not have the knowledge we possess today concerning the length of the stages in the formation of the universe. In the Sixteenth century A.D. for example, Abu al Su'ud, who could not have had any idea of the day as defined astronomically in terms of the Earth's rotation, thought that for the Creation a division must be considered that was not into days as we usually understand the word, but into 'events' (in Arabic nauba).

 

Modern commentators have gone back to this interpretation. Yusuf Ali (1934), in his commentary on each of the verses that deals with the stages in the Creation, insists on the importance of taking the word, elsewhere interpreted as meaning 'days', to mean in reality 'very long Periods, or Ages, or Aeons'.

 

It is therefore possible to say that in the case of the Creation of the world, the Qur'an allows for long periods of time numbering six. It is obvious that modern science has not permitted man to establish the fact that the complicated stages in the process leading to the formation of the universe numbered six, but it has, clearly shown that long periods of time were involved compared to which 'days' as we conceive them would be ridiculous.

 

One of the longest passages of the Qur'an, which deals with the Creation, describes the latter by juxtaposing an account of earthly events and one of celestial events. The verses in question are verses 9 to 12, Surah 41:

(God is speaking to the Prophet)

Say: Do you disbelieve Him Who created the earth in two periods? Do you ascribe equals to Him. He is the Lord of the Worlds. He set in the (earth) mountains standing firm. He blessed it. He measured therein its sustenance in four periods, in due proportion, in accordance with the needs of those who ask for (sustenance? or information?). Moreover (thumma) He turned to heaven when it was smoke and said to it and to the earth: come willingly or unwillingly! They said: we come in willing obedience. Then He ordained them seven heavens in two periods, and He assigned to each heaven its mandate by Revelation. And We adorned the lower heaven with luminaries and provided it a guard. Such is the decree of the All Mighty, the Full of Knowledge.

 

These four verses of Surah 41 contain several points to which we shall return the initially gaseous state of celestial matter and the highly symbolic definition of the number of heavens as seven. We shall see the meaning behind this figure. Also of a symbolic nature is the dialogue between God on the one hand and the primordial sky and earth on the other: here however it is only to express the submission of the heavens and earth, once they were formed, to divine orders.

 

Critics have seen in this passage a contradiction with the statement of the six periods of the Creation. By adding the two periods of the formation of the earth to the four periods of the spreading of its sustenance to the inhabitants, plus the two periods of the formation of the heavens, we arrive at eight periods. This would then be in contradiction with the six per mentioned above.

 

In fact however, this text, which leads man to reflect on divine Omnipotence, beginning with the earth and ending with the heavens, provides two sections that are expressed by the Arabic word 'thumma', translated by 'moreover', but which also means 'furthermore' or 'then'. The sense of a 'sequence' may therefore be implied referring to a sequence of events or a series of man's reflections on the events mentioned here. It may equally be a simple reference to events juxtaposed without any intention of bringing in the notion of the one following the other. However this may be, the periods of the creation of the heavens may just as easily coincide with the two periods of the earth's creation. A little later we shall examine how the basic process of the formation of the universe is presented in the Qur'an and we shall see how it can be jointly applied to the heavens and the earth in keeping with modern ideas. We shall then realize how perfectly reasonable this way is of conceiving the simultaneous nature of the events here described.

 

There does not appear to be any contradiction between the passage quoted here and the concept of the formation of the world in six stages that is to be found in other texts in the Qur'an.

 

The Qur'an Does Not Lay Down a Sequence for the Creation of the Earth and Heavens

In the two passages from the Qur'an quoted above, reference was made in one of the verses to the creation of the heavens and the earth (Surah 7, verse 54), and elsewhere to the creation of the earth and the heavens (Surah 41, verses 9 to 12). The Qur'an does not therefore appear to lay down a sequence for the creation of the heavens and the earth.

 

The number of verses in which the earth is mentioned first is quite small, e.g. Surah 2, verse 29 and Surah 20, verse 4, where reference is made to . Him Who created the earth and the high heavens. The number of verses where the heavens are mentioned before the earth is, on the other hand, much larger: (Surah 7, verse 54; Surah 10 verse 3; 5ura 11, verse 7; Surah 25, verse 59; Surah 32, verse 4; Surah 50 verse 38; Surah 57, verse 4; Surah 79, verses 27 to 33; Surah 91, verse 5 to 10).

 

In actual fact, apart from Surah 79, there is not a single passage in the Qur'an that lays down a definite sequence; a simple coordinating conjunction (wa) meaning 'and' links two terms, or the word thumma which, as has been seen in the above passage, can indicate either a simple juxtaposition or a sequence.

 

There appears to me to be only one passage in the Qur'an where a definite sequence is plainly established between different events in the creation. It is contained in verses 27 to 33, Surah 79:

 

Are you the harder to create or is it the heaven that (God) built? He raised its canopy and fashioned it with harmony. He made dark the night and he brought out the forenoon. And after that (ba'da thalika) He spread it out. Therefrom he drew out its water and its pasture. And the mountains He has fixed firmly. Goods for you and your cattle.

 

This list of earthly gifts from God to man, which is expressed in a language suited to farmers or nomads on the Arabian Peninsula, is preceded by an invitation to reflect on the creation of the heavens. The reference to the stage when God spreads out the earth and renders it arable is very precisely situated in time after the alternating of night and day has been achieved. Two groups are therefore referred to here, one of celestial phenomena, and the other of earthly phenomena articulated in time. The reference made here implies that the earth must necessarily have existed before being spread out and that it consequently existed when God created the heavens. The idea of a concomitance therefore arises from the heavenly and earthly evolutions with the interlocking of the two phenomena. Hence, one must not look for any special significance in the reference in the Qur'anic text of the creation of the earth before the heavens or the heavens before the earth: the position of the words does not influence the order in which the Creation took place, unless, however, it is specifically stated.

 

The Basic Process of the Formation of the Universe and the Resulting Composition of the Worlds

 

The Qur'an presents in two verses a brief synthesis of the phenomena that constituted the basic process of the formation of the Universe.

- Surah 21, verse 30:

Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together, then We clove them asunder and We got every living thing out of the water. Will they not then believe?

- Surah 41, verse 11: God orders the Prophet to speak after inviting

him to reflect on the subject of the earth's creation:

Moreover (God) turned to the Heaven when it was smoke and said to it and to the earth...

There then follow the orders to submit, referred to above.

 

We shall come back to the aquatic origins of life and examine them along with other biological problems raised by the Qur'an. The important things to remember at present are the following:

a) The statement of the existence of a gaseous mass with fine particles, for this is how the word 'smoke' (dukhan in Arabic) is to be interpreted. Smoke is generally made up of a gaseous substratum, plus, in more or less stable suspension, fine particles that may belong to solid and even liquid states of matter at high or low temperature;

b) The reference to a separation process (fatq) of a primary single mass whose elements were initially fused together (ratq). It must be noted that in Arabic 'fatq' is the action of breaking, diffusing, separating, and that 'ratq' is the action of fusing or binding together elements to make a homogenous whole.

 

This concept of the separation of a whole into several parts is noted in other passages of the Book with reference to multiple worlds. The first verse of the first Surah in the Qur'an proclaims, after the opening invocation, the following:
In the name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful, Praise be to God, Lord of the Worlds.

 

The terms 'worlds' reappears dozens of times in the Qur'an. The heavens are referred to as multiple as well, not only on account of their plural form, but also because of their symbolic numerical quantity: 7.

 

This number is used 24 times throughout the Qur'an for various numerical quantities. It often carries the meaning of 'many' although we do not know exactly why this meaning of the figure was used. The Greeks and Romans also seem to have used the number 7 to mean an undefined idea of plurality. In the Qur'an, the number 7 refers to the heavens themselves (samawat), it alone is understood to mean 'heavens'. The 7 roads of the heavens are mentioned once:

- Surah 2, verse 29:

(God) is the One Who created for you all that is on the earth.. Moreover He turned to the heaven and fashioned seven heavens with harmony. He is Full of Knowledge of all things.

- Surah 23, verse 17:

And We have created above you seven paths: We have never been
unmindful of the Creation

- Surah 67, verse 3:

(God) is the One Who created seven heavens one above another. Thou canst see no fault in the creation of the Beneficent. Turn the vision again! Canst thou see any rift?

- Surah 71, verses 15 and 16:

Did you see how God created seven heavens one above another and made the moon a light therein and made the sun a lamp?

- Surah 78, verses 12 and 13:

We have built above you seven strong (heavens) and placed a blazing lamp

Here the blazing lamp is the Sun.

The commentators of the Qur'an are in agreement on all these verses: the number 7 means no more than plurality.

 

There are therefore many heavens and earths, and it comes as no small surprise to the reader of the Qur'an to find that earths such as our own may be found in the universe, a fact that has not yet been verified by man in our time.

Verse 12 of Surah 65 does however predict the following:

 

God is the One Who created seven heavens and of the earth (ard) a similar number. The Command descends among them so that you know that God has power over all things and comprehends all things in His knowledge

 

Since 7 indicates an indefinite plurality (as we have seen), it is possibleto conclude that the Qur'anic text clearly indicates the existence of more than one single earth, our own earth (ard); there are others like it in the universe.

Another observation which may surprise the Twentieth century reader of the Qur'an is the fact that verses refer to three groups of things created, i.e.

- things in the heavens

- things on the earth

- things between the heavens and the earth

Here are several of these verses:

- Surah 20, verse 6:

To Him (God) belongs what is in the heavens, on earth, between them and beneath the soil

- Surah 25, verse 59:

...the One who created the heavens, the earth and what is between them in six periods.

- Surah 32, verse 4:

God is the One Who created the heavens, the earth and what is between them in six periods.

- Surah 50, verse 38:

We created the heavens, the earth and what is between them in six periods, and no weariness touched Us.

 

The reference in the Qur'an to "what is between the heavens and the earth" is again to be found in the following verses: Surah 21, verse 16; Surah 44, verses 7 and 38; Surah 78, verse 37; Surah 15, verse 85; Surah 46, verse 3; Surah 43, verse 85.

 

This creation outside the heavens and outside the earth, mentioned several times, is a priori difficult to imagine. To understand these verses, reference must be made to the most recent human observations on the existence of cosmic extra-galactic material and one must indeed go back to ideas established by contemporary science on the formation of the universe, starting with the simplest and proceeding to the most complex. These are the subject of the following paragraph.

 

Before passing on to these purely scientific matters however, it is advisable to recapitulate the main points on which the Qur'an gives us information about the Creation. According to the preceding quotations, they are as follows:

1. Existence of six periods for the Creation in general.

2. Interlocking of stages in the creation of the heavens and the earth.
3. Creation of the universe out of an initially unique mass forming a block that subsequently split up.

4. Plurality of the heavens and of the earths.

5. Existence of an intermediary creation "between the heavens and the earth".

Some Modern Scientific Data Concerning the Formation of the Universe

 

THE SOLAR SYSTEM

The Earth and planets rotating around the Sun constitute an organized world of dimensions which, to our human scale, appear quite colossal. The Earth is, after all, roughly 93 million miles from the Sun. This is a very great distance for a human being, but it is very small in comparison to the distance separating the Sun from the furthermost planet from it in the solar system (Pluto); in round numbers it is 40 times the distance from the Earth to the Sun, i.e. approximately 3,672 million miles away. This distance, when doubled, represents the largest dimension of our solar system. The Sun's light takes nearly 6 hours to reach Pluto, and yet the journey is made at the terrifying speed of over 186,000 miles per second. The light coming from stars on the very confines of the known celestial world therefore takes billions of years to reach us.

 

THE GALAXIES

The Sun, of which we are a satellite like the other planets surrounding it, is itself an infinitesimally small element among a hundred billion stars that form a whole, called a galaxy. On a fine summer night, the whole of space is seen to be filled with stars that make up what is known as the Milky Way. This group has extremely large dimensions. Whereas light could cross the solar system in units of one hour, it would require something like 90,000 years to go from one extreme to the other of the most compact group of stars that make up our galaxy.

 

The galaxy that we belong to however, even though it is so incredibly huge, is only a small part of the heavens. There are giant agglomerates of stars similar to the Milky Way that are outside our galaxy. They were discovered a little over fifty years ago, when astronomy was able to make use of an optical instrument as sophisticated as the one that made possible the construction of the Mount Wilson telescope in the United States. Thus a very large number indeed of isolated galaxies and masses of galaxies have been discovered that are so far away that it was necessary to institute a special unit of light-years, the 'parsec' (the distance light travels in 3.26 years at 186,000 miles per second).

 

FORMATION AND EVOLUTION 0F GALAXIES, STARS AND PLANETARY SYSTEMS

What was there originally in the immensely large space the galaxies now occupy? Modern science can only answer this question as of a certain period in the evolution of the universe; it cannot put into numbers the length of time that separates this period from us.

 

At the earliest time it can provide us with, modern science has every reason to maintain that the universe was formed a gaseous mass principally composed of hydrogen and a certain amount of helium that was slowly rotating. This nebula subsequently split up into multiple fragments with very large dimensions and masses, so large indeed, that specialists in astrophysics are able to estimate their masses from 1 to 100 billion times the present mass of the Sun (the latter represents a mass that is over 300,000 times that of the Earth). These figures give an idea of the large size of the fragments of primary gaseous mass that were to give birth to the galaxies.

 

A new fragmentation was to form the stars. There then followed the intervention of a condensing process where gravitational forces came into play (since these bodies were moving and rotating more and more quickly), along with pressures and the influence of magnetic fields and of radiation. The stars became shiny as they contracted and transformed the gravitational forces into thermal energy. Thermonuclear reactions came into play, and heavier atoms were formed by fusion at the expense of others that were lighter; this is how the transition was made from hydrogen to helium, then to carbon and oxygen, ending with metals and metalloids. Thus the stars have a life of their own and modern astronomy classifies them according to their present stage of evolution. The stars also have a death; in the final stage of their evolution, the violent implosion of certain stars has been observed so that they become veritable . corpses. .

The planets, and in particular the Earth, also come from a separation process starting from an initial constituent that in the beginning was the primary nebula. A fact that has no longer been contested for over twenty-five years is that the Sun condensed inside the single nebula and that the planets did the same inside the surrounding nebular disc. One must stress - and this is of prime importance for the subject in hand - that there was no sequence in the formation of the celestial elements such at the Sun nor in the formation of an earthly element. There is an evolutionary parallelism with the identity of origin.

 

Here, science can give us information on the period during which the events just mentioned took place. Having estimated the age of our galaxy at roughly ten billion years, according to this hypothesis, the formation of the solar system took place a little over five billion years later. The study of natural radio activity makes it possible to place the age of the Earth and the time the Sun was formed at 4.5 billion years ago, to within a present-day accuracy of 100 million years, according to some scientists' calculations. This accuracy is to be admired, since 100 million years may represent a long time to us but the ratio 'maximum error/total time-to-be-measured' is 0.1/10.5, i.e. 2.2 %.

 

Specialists in astrophysics have therefore attained a high degree of knowledge concerning the general process involved in the formation of the solar system. It may be resumed as follows: condensing and contraction of a rotating gaseous mass, splitting up into fragments that leave the Sun and planets in their places, among them the Earth. The knowledge that science has gained on the primary nebula and the way it split up into an incommensurable quantity of stars grouped into galaxies leaves absolutelno doubt as to the legitimacy of a concept of the plurality of worlds. It does not however provide any kind of certainty concerning the existence in the universe of anything that might, either closely or vaguely, resemble the Earth.

 

THE CONCEPT OF THE PLURALITY OF THE WORLDS

In spite of the above, modern specialists in astrophysics consider it highly likely that planets similar to Earth are present in the universe As far as the solar system is concerned, nobody seriously entertains the possibility of finding general conditions similar to those on Earth on another planet in this system. We must therefore seek for them outside the solar system. The likelihood of their existing outside it is considered quite probable for the following reasons:

 

It is thought that in our galaxy half of the 100 billion stars must, like the Sun, have a planetary system. The fifty billion stars do indeed, like the Sun, rotate very slowly; a characteristic which suggests that they are surrounded by planets that are their satellites. These stars are so far away that the possible planets are unobservable but their existence is thought to be highly probable on account of certain trajectory characteristics; a slight undulation of the star's trajectory indicates the presence of a companion planetary satellite. Thus the Barnard Star probably has at least one planetary companion with a mass greater than that of Jupiter and may even have two satellites. As P. Guerin writes: "All the evidence points to the fact that planetary systems are scattered in profusion all over the universe. The solar system and the Earth are not unique." And as a corollary: "Life, like the planets that harbor it, is scattered throughout the universe, in those places where the physio-chemical conditions necessary for its flowering and development are to be found."

 

INTERSTELLAR MATERIAL

The basic process in the formation of the universe therefore lay in the condensing of material in the primary nebula followed by its division into fragments that originally constituted galactic masses. The latter in their turn split up into stars that provided the sub-product of the process, i.e. the planets. These successive separations left among the groups of principle elements what one might perhaps call 'remains'. Their more scientific name is 'interstellar galactic material'. It has been described in various ways; there are bright nebulae that reflect the light received from other stars and are perhaps composed of 'dusts' or 'smokes', to use the terminology of experts in astrophysics, and then there are the dark nebulae that are less dense, consisting of interstellar material that is even more modest, known for its tendency to interfere with photometric measurements in astronomy. There can be no doubt about the existence of 'bridges' of material between the galaxies themselves. Although these gases may be very rarefied, the fact that they occupy such a colossal space, in view of the great distance separating the galaxies, could make them correspond to a mass possibly greater than the total mass of the galaxies in spite of the low density of the former. A. Boichot considers the presence of these intergalactic masses to be of prime importance which could "considerably alter ideas on the evolution of the universe". We must now go back to the basic ideas on the creation of the universe that were taken from the Qur'an and look at them in the light of modern scientific data.

Confrontation with the Data in the Qur'an Concerning the Creation

 

We shall examine the five main points on which the Qur'an gives information about the Creation.

 

1. The Six periods of the creation of the heavens and the earth covered, according to the Qur'an, the formation of the celestial bodies and the earth, and the development of the latter until (with its . sustenance. ) it became inhabitable by man. In the case of the Earth, the events described in the Qur'an happened over four periods. One could perhaps see in them the four geological periods described by modern science, with man's appearance, as we already know, taking place in the quaternary era. This is purely a hypothesis since nobody has an answer to this question. It must be noted however, that the formation of the heavenly bodies and the Earth, as explained in verses 9 to 12, Surah 41 (see page 142) required two phases. If we take the Sun and its sub-product the earth as an example (the only one accessible to us), science informs us that their formation occurred by a process of condensing of the primary nebula and then their separation. This is exactly what the Qur'an expresses very clearly when it refers to the processes that produced a fusion and subsequent separation starting from a celestial 'smoke'. Hence there is complete correspondence between the facts of the Qur'an and the facts of science.

2. Science showed the interlocking of the two stages in the formation of a star (like the Sun) and its satellite (like the Earth). This interconnection is surely very evident in the text of the Qur'an examined.

3. The existence at an early stage of the universe of the 'smoke' referred to in the Qur'an, meaning the predominantly gaseous state of the material that composes it, obviously corresponds to the concept of the primary nebula put forward by modern science.

4. The plurality of the heavens, expressed in the Qur'an by the number 7, whose meaning we have discussed, is confirmed by modern science due to the observations experts in astrophysics have made on galactic systems and their very large number. On the other hand the plurality of earths that are similar to ours (from certain points of view at least) is an idea that arises in the text of the Qur'an but has not yet been demonstrated to be true by science; all the same, specialists consider this to be quite feasible.

5. The existence of an intermediate creation between 'the heavens' and 'the earth' expressed in the Qur'an may be compared to the discovery of those bridges of material present outside organized astronomic systems.

 

Although not all the questions raised by the descriptions in the Qur'an have been completely confirmed by scientific data, there is in any case absolutely no opposition between the data in the Qur'an on the Creation and modern knowledge on the formation of the universe. This fact is worth stressing for the Qur'anic Revelation, whereas it is very obvious indeed that the present-day text of the Old Testament provides data on the same events that are unacceptable from a scientific point of view. It is hardly surprising, since the description of the Creation in the Sacerdotal version of the Bible was written by priests at the time of the deportation to Babylon who had the legalist intentions already described and therefore complied a description that fitted their theological views. The existence of such an enormous difference between the Biblical description and the data in the Qur'an concerning the Creation is worth underlining once again on account of the - totally gratuitous - accusations leveled against Muhammad (peace be upon him) since the beginnings of Islam to the effect that he copied the Biblical descriptions. As far as the Creation is concerned, this accusation is totally unfounded. How could a man living fourteen hundred years ago have made corrections to the existing description to such an extent that he eliminated scientifically inaccurate material and, on his own initiative, made statements that science has only in the present day been able to verify? This hypothesis is completely untenable. The description of the Creation given in the Qur'an is quite different from the one in the Bible.

 

Answers to Certain Objections

It is quite indisputable that resemblances exist between narrations dealing with other subjects, particularly religious history, which are to be found in the Bible and in the Qur'an. It is moreover interesting to note from this point of view how nobody holds against Jesus the fact that he resumes the same sort of facts and Biblical teachings. This does not, of course, stop people in the West from accusing Muhammad (peace be upon him) of referring to them in his teachingwith the suggestion that he is an imposter because be presents them as a Revelation. As for the proof that Muhammad (peace be upon him) reproduced in the Qur'an what he had been told or dictated by the rabbis, it has no more substance than the statement that a Christian monk gave him a sound religious education. One would do well to re-read what R. Blachere in his book, The Problem of Muhammad (Le Probleme de Mahomet), has to say about this 'fable'.

 

A hint of a resemblance is also advanced between other statements in the Qur'an and beliefs that go back a very long way, probably much further than the time the Bible appeared.

 

More generally speaking, the traces of certain cosmogonic myths have been sought in the Holy Scriptures; for example the belief held by Polynesians in the existence of primeval waters that were covered in darkness until they separated when light appeared; thus Heaven and Earth were formed. This myth is compared to the description of the Creation in the Bible, where there is undoubtedly a resemblance. It would however be superficial to then accuse the Bible of having copied this from the cosmogonic myth.

 

It is just as superficial to see the Qur. anic concept of the division of the primeval material constituting the universe at its initial stage a concept held by modern science - as one that comes from various cosmogonic myths in one form or another that express something resembling it.

 

It is also superficial to see the Qur. anic concept of the division closely. Often an initial idea appears among them which is reasonable in itself, and is in some cases born out by what we today know (or think we know) to be true, except that fantastic descriptions are attached to it in the myth. This is the case of the fairly widespread concept of the Heavens and the Earth originally being united then subsequently separated.

 

When, as in Japan, the image of the egg plus an expression of chaos is attached to the above with the idea of a seed inside the egg (as for all eggs), the imaginative addition makes the concept lose all semblance of seriousness.

 

In other countries, the idea of a plant is associated with it; the plant grows and in so doing raises up the sky and separates the Heavens from the Earth. Here again, the imaginative quality of the added detail lends the myth its very, distinctive character. Nevertheless a common characteristic remains, i.e. the notion of a single mass at the beginning of the evolutionary process leading to the formation of the universe which then divided to form the various 'worlds' that we know today.

 

The reason these cosmogonic myths are mentioned here is to underline the way they have been embroidered by man's imagination and to show the basic difference between them and the statements in the Qur'an on the same subject. The latter are free from any of the whimsical details accompanying such beliefs; on the contrary, they are distinguished by the sober quality of the words in which they are made and their agreement with scientific data.

 

Such statements in the Qur'an concerning the Creation, which appeared nearly fourteen centuries ago, obviously do not lend themselves to a human explanation.